This week’s articles were dense, to say the least. In particular, the one by Emejulu and
McGregor (2016) It was a slow read, then reread, kind of article, but worth
putting in the time. The idea of radical
digital citizenship should not have felt so foreign to me, but it was. I had many eye-opening moments reading that
article. I had never taken time to think
about the resources needed to build all of the technology that we consume, nor
about who was doing the labour. And the
example of Robert Moses and how he planned the freeways and bridges to exclude
minority groups – never in a million years would I think that someone would
think and act like that.
I noted a couple of the quotes that Jeremey used that really
made me reflect, “We know too much, but understand too little” and “When we use
these sites, we’re not the consumer, we’re the product”. Powerful.
The article by Emejulu and
McGregor concludes with a comment that they are “sceptical about the
possibilities of developing a radical digital citizenship in digital education”. I believe that this is true for now, but I
remain hopeful that we are making steps in the right direction.
I absolutely loved how Kimberley and Kristy provided us for
the framework to use for video analysis.
What a great tool to use with students.
I would love to show them a real video and then a fake video and see how
their answers compare. We must teach children to think critically
about what they see, and to look for bias.
As this article https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/28/opinion/fake-news-and-the-internet-shell-game.html
from the New York Times shares, years ago when we heard something “outrageous”
we would have ignored the information, knowing that if it were true, we would
surely have heard about it from a credible source. Nowadays, people happily retweet or repost
very outrageous things without fact checking.
Our students are doing this at an
alarming rate when they hear news/gossip about their peers.
We were left with the question about how to apply this digital
literacy in our classrooms, since it does not have its own curriculum. Off the top of my head, I am thinking that it
would fit nicely under the Social Studies “Research and Communication” or “Critical
Thinking and Citizenship” strands, as well as the “Critical Thinking” strand in
Language Arts. We just need to be creative with the “big idea”
that we are presenting to students, and dig a bit deeper into these
topics.
This Ted Talk, relates well to the template shared by Kimberley and Kristy, and speaks to the importance of helping students
think critically about media literacy, and how to give them the “golden lasso”
of truth.
This talk also speaks to how in social media "we are the product". A bit of doom and gloom, but then talks about the positive aspects as well.
The new English Language Arts curriculum is a great place to integrate critical thinking and digital media with it's focus expanding our understanding of texts and considering the power and agency language can afford us ... for the good and the bad. Understanding bias, purpose and audience is such a key piece in interpreting the online messages we receive.
ReplyDeleteI very much enjoyed your post - good reflective thought and those are great spots to include these ideas in the curriculum. Thanks for sharing those videos.
ReplyDelete